when i talk about that, makes me angry

Hi, today i want to talk about the changes that i could be made to my study programme. The first thing that i could change is the curriculum. When i was in first year of anthropology i had Latinoamerican History and Social History of Chili, two subjects very important for me because there were the uniques critic subjects or the most critic subjects in the middle of too many bad and abstracts maths. In the beginning of the second semester this same year, the career - in the frame of the curriculum innovation - opening journeys of dicussion about the subjects, programs and teachers of every specialty. In this journeys the public decided remove all of history subjects change it for subjects like 'modern problems of anthropology' or 'modern society' leaving out our history of the curriculum therefore of our training. 

This make me angry because, all of the faculty facilities, the technology services and others materials to the study, there are transformed in ornaments materials when the careers do not have social contents in the sense with the social science. Moreover this things are transformed to the service to the market and the capitalist economic sciences that request social sciences without critic therefore without social history of our continent and our countries. 

On the other hand, the teaching methods are so bad ingeneral, because the persons that makes the class, they aren't teachers, then they don't have pedagogic methods, their classes are so expositives and a little bit of practice, therefore they comprehend the anthropology from the desktop and in their chairs. 

byebye